Amicus Brief in Jacobsen v. Katzer
Software Freedom Law Show episode Secial Episode 1
Karen and Bradley discuss the SFLC's amicus brief in the Jacobsen v. Katzer with their colleague, Aaron Williamson.
Running time: 00:19:01.Show Notes
Segment 0 (00:27)
- Bradley referred to the two different types of Latin pronunciation, which he learned in school as: Classic and Church. (01:33)
- Karen explains what an amicus brief is. (01:47)
- Aaron explained that the earlier court ruling that was a success for Free Software. (03:38)
- An injunction in this context is a ruling from a court that the violator of the license must stop their activity that infringes the copyright. (05:46)
- Karen explained why Free Software licenses are interpreted as copyright licenses rather than contracts, and why that is advantageous. (06:15)
- Aaron explained why preliminary injunctions are a particular important remedy for Free Software developers. (07:00)
- Karen mentioned we would have a direct link to our brief in the show notes, which is there and in the summary as well. (10:45)
- Bradley mentioned his work regarding the Artistic-1.0 license (which is detailed in a blog post). (11:30, 13:30)
- Each court has a different admission process. (14:27)
Send feedback and comments on the oggcast to <oggcast@softwarefreedom.org> or <oggcast@faif.us>. You can keep in touch with the SFLC on our IRC channel, #sflc on irc.freenode.net, and by following SFLC on identi.ca.